The Lost Individual
Spencer (2007)
introduced an intriguing aspect of John Dewey’s philosophy in his article in, The
Pluralist. It seems that Dewey believed that there
was a problem in the relationship between the individual and the community. His belief, contrary to other
philosophers, who believed man’s behavior was shaped by habit, was that the
process of change often produced conditions that could be explained. The conditions that lead to change can
also cause certain individuals to become detached. He called this detached person a lost individual, and suggested that this
detachment occurred because of the changing social conditions of
industrialization.
Dewey
did have a plan for saving this lost individual, which was in a form of public
socialism. Dewey’s public
socialism was different from capitalistic socialism in that he was more
concerned with individuals sharing in social profits rather than economic
profits.
It
is ironic that Dewey called the individual self “lost” when the educational
system of the 21st century seems to have lost its way, as well. This could be due to the detachment of
the learners that are sitting within the four walls of these public school
systems. Even though, Dewey was
referring to industrialization as the force that caused the detachment in the
early 20th century, we can connect this same detachment to the
students of the 21st century.
These students have been changed by the technological forces of a global
society, yet have been denied access of these forces as part of their community
within today’s educational system.
It seems evident that today’s teachers need to create a learning
environment that incorporates the totality of a student’s community in order to
help students learn to be receptive and responsible citizens. What better place than the community
for assisting students in learning by reflecting on their own unique
experiences.
Spencer,
A. (2007). Am I my brother’s keeper? Royce and Dewey on the community’s responsibility for the lost individual.
The pluralist. 2(1), 71-80.
No comments:
Post a Comment